top of page

BIOL 6210: Proposal Review form

All students (for credit or auditors) in BIOL6210 are expected to serve as peer reviewers for grant proposals submitted by their peers. This review will serve as an opportunity to provide constructive and good-faith feedback to peers and to practice serving as a reviewer.

Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the proposal, including things such as 1) the potential for the proposed research to advance knowledge and understanding within its field or across different fields, 2) whether the research explores creative, original, or compelling concepts, 3) whether the research plan is well-reasoned, well-organized, and based on a sound rationale.

Please provide an overall score for this proposal:

​

Poor:  The proposal has serious flaws

Fair:  Proposal lacking in one or more critical aspects; key issues need to be addressed

Good:  A quality proposal, worthy of support

Very Good:  High-quality proposal in nearly all aspects; should be supported if at all possible

Excellent:  Outstanding proposal in all respects; deserves highest priority for support

Select an option

Your answer has been recorded. Thanks for submitting!

UVM_Logo_Primary_Horiz_G.png
  • orcid-og-image
  • github-512
  • google_Scholar
  • BlueSky
  • LinkedIn

© Joaquin C. B. Nunez 2025

bottom of page